Faux family …

Why do some churches use canned photos of models on their website?

I’m not saying that’s wrong. It’s not something I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about. It’s something I’ve noticed lately that a lot of churches seem to be doing. So I’m thinking “out loud” in this post …

The reason why there are models in photos for general use is to paint a specific image. When an organization of any kind uses them, the idea they’re communicating is … “We’re made up of these pretty people.”

What’s wrong with some quality photos of the real people who make up the real church? Not visually appealing enough?

So if you capture someone’s attention with models who have nothing to do with your local congregation (and may have opposite views and commitments for all you know) why would you want to mislead someone with faux visuals? Five minutes visiting a church service might leave the visitor thinking, “These folks aren’t anything like the pictures on the website …”

I think there’s a difference between using available photography for general images and ideas, but people photos as a representation of the people in a local church? For me, it strikes me as … odd?

Really, this is thinking out loud. I’m not making a big issue of this. But why are churches doing this?

Are we that mentally enslaved to Madison Avenue?

Scotty